Message 1 of 6
I applaud this, as it can be a nightmare to have something work correctly in one release, only to have it fail in the next release.
I also understand that new features get added between dot releases.
Of primary interest to me as a user is that everything just works. If everything does not work (such as the views in 9.2), then my primary concern is that the next release comes out quickly with bug fixes.
Perhaps the introduction of new features increases the amount of bugs that get introduced. If this is the case would eliminating new features in dot releases speed up the release process?
Message 2 of 6
Message 3 of 6
I have to plot and do drawings in 9.31 and do my models in 9.2
For a week I've done well to not save a part in 9.31, but today I accidentally hit save. Now I can not get back into 9.2 which is able to solid fillet my model. Because of this I've lost my entire history tree until the next release comes out. What grinds me is that I know that the next release will follow a lengthy QA testing which might not be as necessary if there were no more enhancements introduced.
If everything worked right I could care less in what the procedure was. I just hate going backwards.
Message 4 of 6
Message 5 of 6
Message 6 of 6
- drawing angles in autocad
- Free 3d house design software
- using cad to work out area of a shape
- how to make cross section in autocad
- unable to select objects in autocad
- how to convert bak file to dwg
- dgn converter
- How to install ZW3D
- How to print a multi-page PDF from drawings
- buy solidworks 2011
- autocad license error
- free dwf viewer for mac
- copyclip command not allowed during reference editing
- how to open dwg on mobile phone
- how to find area in autocad