Message 1 of 6
I applaud this, as it can be a nightmare to have something work correctly in one release, only to have it fail in the next release.
I also understand that new features get added between dot releases.
Of primary interest to me as a user is that everything just works. If everything does not work (such as the views in 9.2), then my primary concern is that the next release comes out quickly with bug fixes.
Perhaps the introduction of new features increases the amount of bugs that get introduced. If this is the case would eliminating new features in dot releases speed up the release process?
Message 2 of 6
Message 3 of 6
I have to plot and do drawings in 9.31 and do my models in 9.2
For a week I've done well to not save a part in 9.31, but today I accidentally hit save. Now I can not get back into 9.2 which is able to solid fillet my model. Because of this I've lost my entire history tree until the next release comes out. What grinds me is that I know that the next release will follow a lengthy QA testing which might not be as necessary if there were no more enhancements introduced.
If everything worked right I could care less in what the procedure was. I just hate going backwards.
Message 4 of 6
Message 5 of 6
Message 6 of 6
- how to recover dwg files after crash
- free 3d cad software dwg
- sketchup dwg
- freecad tutorials
- drawing a gear in autocad
- cad cam software free download
- mechanical design software free download
- where do the roll or fold lines go on sheet metal drawings
- buy solidworks 2011
- dwg to skp
- autocad cursor highlights polylines
- drawing software for metal sheet development
- dgn converter
- autocad turn off the smart command
- acad dwg viewer